Friday, October 30, 2009

Is Diversity Good?

I her reflection on one of our class sessions, Kim presents the thoughts of two semi-fictitious students surrounding another class-member’s statement of confusion with the direction of discussion. (That was you, right, Kim?) I say “semi-ficticious” because, while neither Rebecca nor Felicity actually exist, I’m confident their thought processes are common enough that one could say our class holds many Rebeccas and Felicitys.

Kim presents the two girls as having very dissimilar reactions to the unnamed student’s outburst. This third student questions whether it is useful to continue discussing the class project’s minor details before its main goal is specified. Rebecca is decidedly resistant to halting the discussion right away, arguing that the minor details will be a deciding factor in the general direction of the goal. Felicity sides with the third student, seeing it as more useful to start working on the project and work out the kinks along the way, as the deadline is approaching quickly. In the end, Felicity “wins,” as the class breaks up into smaller groups and starts tackling the logistics of starting the group project.

The discord between Rebecca and Felicity is also semi-fictitious, being imaginary in this case but real in almost any group-project setting. Nearly every time a diverse group of people is put together to accomplish a goal, at least two of the group members are in disagreement. This is unavoidable. There will always be both Rebeccas and Felicitys, it’s what diversity is all about.

As an instructor of an engineering introductory course, “Diversity” was one of the subjects I had to present to my class of freshmen. The instructions I was given were fairly vague; it was assumed that I knew what “Diversity” was and why it is always desirable. When it came to teaching the class, however, I found myself at a loss. I couldn’t find a logical way to argue that diversity is always better. From an objective standpoint, doesn’t diversity seem like a negative thing when, say, a group of people with extremely differing viewpoints can’t find common ground? Couldn’t this, for instance, ruin the effectiveness of a group project?

I was forced to think of a reason why diversity is better, even in the case of a group of people having absolutely nothing in common, capable only of arguing. The engineering course guidelines offered the cookie-cutter answer of, “diversity teaches people to open their minds to new thoughts and experiences.” Yes, yes. I think everyone has heard a version of this line at some point. It may be true, but I was looking for something more compelling, more relevant.

Perhaps I could argue that, despite the dissonance, diversity might help to increase the ability of the group. For instance, the motivation of the group as a whole might be impacted by the fact that the group members have starkly different personalities.

Joe had good way of phrasing the right way to increase motivation. In his post about group alignment, he remembers a speaker relating the motivation a person should feel towards prayer to the draw caused by a Krispy Kreme “Hot Now!” sign. Although Joe calls it corny, I consider the analogy perfect: motivation is caused by an obvious, loud attractiveness. So how can diversity make a group objective “Hot Now”?

In the case of Rebecca and Felicity, both students have clearly different interests. Although it can’t be said to be absolutely true, a person’s interests generally line up with their skills; they like same things that they are good at. (I don’t want to impose any cause or effect in this case: like we discussed in one of our early classes, it’s unclear whether interest breeds skill because of increased practice or skill breeds interest because of the joy of doing something well.) The same mentality could be raised to the group: a group most likes what it is doing when it is doing it well. If Rebecca and Felicity are both allowed to pursue their particular interests in the group, the overall happiness of the group is raised. The more diverse the group, the more the total amount of different problems it can accomplish, and the happier it becomes.

Of course, this isn’t by any stretch a perfectly logical argument. Surely, the arguments born from the diversity of the group still stand as obstacles towards a happy (and effective) group. This reflection should be taken as more of an advocation for diversity, which I see as an opportunity to make a group “Hot Now”.

4 comments:

  1. I like that this post is called "diversity". I think there are many directions or themes that could have been taken from Kim's post, and diversity was a good one to pick.

    In our case, having different interests definitely has a time-cost to it. We spent more time discussing (something Felicity would despise) because so many different points were being brought up. Some people wanted to fix this, others that. If we are unable to accomplish the ideas that were brought up, perhaps we have failed the benefits of different opinions. Maybe at that point, we would have been better off picking one topic and sticking to it.

    But if we are able to accomplish all of those ideas, we have taken complete advantage of the beauty that is diversity.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey David,

    Sure, people of course would be happier if they were allowed to do some tasks where their personalities fit. Case in point, I was put front and center in all of the jobs I have had because I like meeting new people and find it easy to make friends and acquaintances.

    Yet despite the different personalities, a group comes together because they believe in the same thing and want to do something about it. The only thing we have in common in the class is that we are all CHP students - we didn't even pick the class project.

    I also think that the main difference that Kim was trying to get across was that Felicity is a doer, and Rebecca is, well, not.

    Let me know what you think, and your ideas on how to best go about fixing it.

    -Alessandra

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think that Rebecca is a do-er. She does after more thinking and planning than her counterpart.

    ReplyDelete
  4. On the diversity front, Scott Page's book, The Difference, might have helped. He makes some interesting arguments for why diverse groups are more productive.

    It would be very good if you guys could tie this discussion to Drucker. What about effectiveness, for example?

    ReplyDelete